Portland art blog + news + exhibition reviews + galleries + contemporary northwest art

recent entries

Mid April Links
America's Whispered Truths closing at Archer Gallery
Early April Critique of Institution Links
Spring Cleaning Cluster Reviews
Spring Calls
More Spring Cleaning
Early Spring Cleaning Links
D.E. May 1952-2019
Save OCAC protests
February links to Love
The end of OCAC?
End of January Links

recent comments

categories

 

Book Review
Calls for Artists
Design Review
Essays
Interviews
News
Openings & Events
Photoblogs
Reviews
Video
Links
About PORT

regular contributors

 

Tori Abernathy
Amy Bernstein
Katherine Bovee
Emily Cappa
Patrick Collier
Arcy Douglass
Megan Driscoll
Jesse Hayward
Sarah Henderson
Jeff Jahn
Kelly Kutchko
Drew Lenihan
Victor Maldonado
Christopher Moon
Jascha Owens
Alex Rauch
Gary Wiseman

archives

 

Guest Contributors
Past Contributors
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005

contact us

 

Contact us

search

 


syndicate

 

Atom
RSS

powered by

 

Movable Type 3.16

This site is licensed under a

 

Creative Commons License

Tuesday 06.15.10

« a smorgasboard of opportunities | Main | place carvings video »

Eva Lake's Targets at Augen Gallery

target_46.jpg

Target NO.46 (Jean)

In a month with some serious talent on display, Eva Lake's Targets show at Augen Gallery easily speaks the strongest. It possesses a clear, personal voice that can only come from hard won experience and self-knowledge, melding Robert Indiana style Pop constructions and Richard Hamilton collage with the power/fragility of Hollywood's glamour factory. Rather than mere pop-mongering or simple Hollywood fetishism, Targets feels like the product of a long relationship between fashion, art, glamour and the perils and use of power of being in the public eye... not unlike Lake herself who has been a longtime stalwart of the 80's East Village scene and Portland's Renaissance in the past decade or so. This is a woman whom most people in the scene have a strong opinion about and they should... because she's good.

With its visceral collage materials viewing Targets is almost like paging through a bunch of old an new fashion magazines at a vintage clothing store and it's mobius strip like quality feels like Fritz Lang meets Man Ray (classic Hollywood was built upon the langugages of surrealism and the mid-century German film making with the added allure of American-style glamour).

What's more it manages to make the sociological discussions around famous women more than some statistical chart or TMZ style exploitation (art is good at unpacking Hollywood without rendering it dull). Instead, Targets is a study in an industry of visual power, its price and a kind of unabashed appreciation for drop dead beauty... the kind that endures no matter what. Fact is, this show reminds me what I love about strong women... the kind that seem to pull everything and everyone into their orbit. It goes beyond sex object... becoming an organizing force for civilization, which parallels fashion and design etc.

target42.jpg
Target NO.42 (Lana)

My favorite piece in the show is Target NO.42 (Lana). It isn't just that Lana Turner is the pivotal actress between color and black and white films (referenced by oscillating stripes of both approaches in her image here) it's the way her disembodied peroxide blond head looms over LA tract housing like a UFO or the sun. Turner wasn't some dumb blond but rather she is a harbinger of the mid-century American ideal... a dream of home ownership as a projection of empire. Instead of some sex symbol, I simply see my own Mom here (she is/was a true platinum blond) and her ideals as a home economist, become real-estate broker/developer, something Lana Turner was also known for. It is also an innocent or naive world that no longer exists. We simply can't continue to build sprawling low density housing and this piece firmly places that old worldview in the past... compelling though it was it's a world long gone. It also reminds me of Man Ray's photography though it's almost an inversion of his object on object layering. Instead this is more like culture jamming of Man Ray by more overtly evoking the hypnotic effects of beauty with the target forms.

manray.jpg Man Ray, Noire et Blanche, 1926

Instead of Man Ray's purposeful objectification, Lake is someone who looks back at the visual repertoire of women and pop culture through the ages and is restaging them in restless push pull compositions. It's more akin to Kubrick's hypnotic structures and Jasper Johns' Targets than the photographic sources she's literally drawing from. For collage it's a difficult feat to get beyond and transfigure your source material but this is Lake's achievement here. I also like how each piece is titled Target NO.# ... like Chanel NO.5, she seems to be trying to capture the essence of many ephemeral things here.

target49_2.jpg
Target NO.49 (Natalie)

No place is the anti object clearer than her Target NO. 49 (Natalie). Here Lake has amusingly combined a Greek frieze with Natalie Wood just as she is crossing the threshold into young womanhood after being a child star. She's no bombshell, she's the girl next door... pleasant, non-threatening and given immense gravitas via the great antiquity of her stone carved torso. Rather than some Venus of Wellendorf though this piece calls transitions into play (rather than roles)... something another artist in the show Lindsay Lohan has had trouble navigating. The point is, young women need not always be the prey of "enquiring minds" ...it's actually an exciting time and though I don't have a daughter I sense the intensity of this moment from every father who has a daughter at this tender age. Lake has done a remarkable job of presenting the fresh faced moment here and her lucky number 7's portray Wood in a positive light. It's safe top say, no man could have made this and it takes a pretty secure woman to make these deft choices as well. If you wallow in bitterness you simply can't celebrate Natalie Wood or any young woman at this age and it's been a great shift in nuance for women's studies as of late, which allows for less didactic more transitional discussions about this crucial age.

target25.jpg
Target NO.25 (Tina)

Lake's Target NO. 25 (Tina) has the most active presence in the show. Here Tina Turner's lips, caught in song, exist outside the center of the target and a growling riot dog in the back of her head. In the "back of her mind" the dog is certainly an allusion to the civil rights movement that paralleled the rise of her early career and the her voice existed outside of barriers that were never left behind, all the while transcending them. This piece is the one most reminiscent of Warhol in the show and even then it is way more like Hamilton or Rosenquist.

target1_liza2.jpg
Target NO.1 (Liza)

The show is consistently good, with art hiostorical images of Ann Margaret and a John Chamberlain car crush sculpture and Marylin Monroe + Vishnu. Maybe the "crush" is appropriate if not too cheeky a pun. There are also the predictable multiple Liz Taylors and Marylyn Monroes, Lindsay Lohan is presented as a bottle that looks out at us meeting our gaze and a rocking Liza Minnelli festooned with party pills... she's presented as somewhat of a victim of her own devices but Lake celebrates her strength as a performer equally as much. This show has teeth and Target NO. 46 (Jean) succeeds in being both a crisp fashion forward statement as well as a wry structural critique. Liza Minnelli in Target NO. 4 is a simple double entendre evoking intercourse and the way an LP are put into and taken out of a sleeve... ok ok I get it but it probably needed to be in the show, Broadway demands it?

target12_natalie.jpg
Target NO.12 (Natalie)

Still, the most chilling work in the show is Target NO.12 (Natalie). Natalie is shown in the landscape (as through a scope) with a drawn revolver. Yes there is always a fetish for images of women and phallic guns but there is something about the portentous mystery here... is it alluding to her untimely death and somewhat mysterious drowning, or is it simply the study in her mystique? Probably both. The most important thing here is she shows how Wood grows in depth and mystery... she isn't some static icon.

Overall, it's the sheer scope and sustained tension in even the most light hearted pieces that makes Targets so particularly engaging. What I sense is a real love for these women, both flawed and perfection at the same time which mimics the mass media and iconography their chosen role's present. It's ok to love women for what they are, which is very difficult to generalize... so Lake's show is very specific and on target here.

Targets is a show about the power of appeal, the very grease that keeps Hollywood going and Lake's approach is historical, personal and iconographic. What makes it exceptional it the way it portrays the glamour and the problems without apology. None of these women are presented as saints, goddesses or sinners, merely a reflection of Lake's laser sharp interest in their power without denying its source... the fact that all of these women have survived more or less under the spotlight for an extended duration when others haven't. Lake isn’t simply a fan, she's curated their enduring paradoxes and presented them as think pieces that happen to be easy on the eyes. This is an essay in the power of women that is both visual and intellectual in its nostalgia and presentness. Beauty is a form of power and Lake does more than pay attention to it, she studies and appreciates it without being simply a fan. All of these women, Lake included, have made a contribution as artists... there is an awareness here and this show is a bullseye.

Posted by Jeff Jahn on June 15, 2010 at 15:06 | Comments (0)


Comments

Post a comment

Thanks for signing in, . Now you can comment. (sign out)

(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)


Remember me?


s p o n s o r s
Site Design: Jennifer Armbrust   •   Site Development: Philippe Blanc & Katherine Bovee