Ryan Shank's mural "Friendly Times With Old Smellyneck"
Warehouse shows have a near mythological status in the art world as spaces pregnant
with possibilities and as benchmarks of ambitions. Historically, exhibitions like
Damien
Hirst's Freeze or the goings on at
Forcefield's
Fort Thunder have introduced new tight knit casts of art world characters
and counter movements designed to change very local expectations and redirect
the gaze of art viewing audiences. In theory at least, they present a challenge to
the status quo and in the case of Hirst or Forcefield, they had lasting effects.
Portland has had a ton of warehouse shows; many are good with sustained curatorial
merit like last month's
Retinal
Reverb which practically begged to be evaluated seriously. Others like the
2003's
Modern Zoo were pretty much messy or scattershot free for alls with an "energetic"
mandate to fill space, with rare moments of interest as the other
extreme. Generally, warehouse shows work best when they are noninstitutional.
When hitched to an institution they simply become signposts for the host, diverting
attention from the artists and usurping the whole
raison d'etre. Another
guerilla or noninsitutional show,
Mississippi:May
was not as sophisticated, sustained or focused as last month's Retinal Reverb,
but it still holds a good many new names to watch. As ambition goes M:M succeeds more as a scrappy community flowering, a reminder more than a watershed for new standards. That
said, several artists deserve some attention and since today is the show's last
day it's time to oblige...
Overall, Mississippi:May's character seemed more street than any warehouse
show Ive ever seen in Portland. It's just more evidence that Portland is always
shifting and continues to attract interesting artists who are generally not
served by institutions or galleries. It also means those institutions directly
involved in serving and developing emerging Portland artists need to address
the kind of adventure found here and cultivate their next steps.
Shanks (background), Wallace (middle), Grey (foreground)
First off, the space is memorable and bizarre, a giant A frame warehouse that
has intrigued me for years. Think 50,000 square foot Howard Johnsons... I'm
glad someone is putting it to use before it is torn down for a large condo development
in Portland's hot North Mississippi neighborhood.
Initially M:M wasn't encouraging. The outside entranceway was rather Burning
Man with two rows of dragon's teeth and it seemed more stagecraft than strong
conceptual statement. Once inside though the two giant murals by Ryan Shanks
were visually arresting. The Wild West themes of the murals were appropriate
as Portland's hyperactive cultural landscape doesn't have a lot of barbed wire
yet. In contrast to most of the work here the murals were well scaled to the
enormous room. It also got points for not ripping off Barry McGee or his late
wife
Margaret
Kilgallen.
I also found the hastily assembled white walls at the beginning of the show
distracting. It would have been better to have made half as many decent looking
walls or just let the space be what it was. This is the biggest danger in warehouse
shows, asking the space to be what it isn't without the requisite budget.
Highlights:
Ansell's Caitlyn
Julian Ansell's stop motion video of squawking meat detritus in the sink was
disgusting while reminding me of Sesame Street short as filmed by Dr. Mengele.
Ansell's installations had merit too, especially the one with a naked creature
in a hamster cage with the name Caitlyn on it. Sure contemporary sculpture has
a whole department devoted to convincing fleshy things but I like the use of
the cage here as well. In general, Ansell's dioramas were interesting but the
overall install was so crowded with junky furniture and other pointless details
that it detracted from the mood. Next time either recreate a convincing bedroom
populated with strange creatures or remove anything extraneous beyond the cages
and creatures.
The altered poster "Winning Combination" by Joshua Wallace (the show's
lead organizer) was also very well done. Loaded with cartoony pheremonal action
on a pop support it reminded me of Franz West's kinky pop paintings along with a touch of Carol Dunham. This was the strongest
work in the show.
Rose McCormick (the best known of the artists here, besides the cartoonist Callahan)
had her portable studio in action. The painting she was working on opening
night, a washy white and sage colored abstraction that looked done then... was interesting. Later
she ruined it by adding her recent spate of troubadour figures. McCormick is at her best when the
work consists of simplified symbols like the small abstraction in the left hand corner in the image above.
Unidentified artist worth identifying
One (as yet unidentified artist) climbed a support beam with doodley billowing
details. An entire room of this would be fantastic.
I also liked how the installation by Dante Fugazzotto and Daryl Bergman blurred
utilitarian and graphic elements. Something about how it functioned as a stage
and a painting could be developed further.
Misses and near misses:
Asa Kennedy's heart shaped plastic books looked like street fair totchkes.
There was also a collection of cassettes and an Atari 2600 video game cartridge,
a nice hipster homage to the 80's but that's all it was.
A near miss was the big circular installation by Issac Grey (from Oklahoma)
consisting of neapolitan colored concentric rings around a central reflective
dome. Titled, "You See What You see," it evoked a meeting of Jim Lambie
and Anish Kapoor on a $45 budget. Maybe it is not the worst way to spend $45
and looked alright from across the room. It showed some spatial consideration
but up close it looked hasty or like a neglected playground feature, which has
its own charm.
Initially, most of the graffiti work wasn't as interesting as the stuff I regularly
see around town, but this green faced dragon(?) had character and a complicated
series of folds making up its figure. The graffiti wall became more developed
as the show went along
Most of the installations mostly seemed like hasty BFA level work but all made
good use of light. The best of this group was Alesha Wessler's "Vena Cava"
a paper mache cave that still could use some refinement.
Other artists to watch:
Lauren Taylor's untitled portraits
Ben Sault's crazy construction in the back was also very cool and probably unintentionally so
it is a kind of street fueled Richard Tuttle. A few of these in a nice gallery
would be a shot of adrenaline to the old white box.
In closing, none of this was particularly earth shattering but one of the best
things about Portland is how the scene allows people to develop in these settings.
In many other places you might be expected to be fully developed right after
the BFA or MFA but here many end up doing it while working as a barista or in
food service. It might not be the quickest, most glamorous way for an artist
compared to Chelsea's freshly minted MFA from the Yale/Columbia formula but
I think it complicates the work.
There really is something to making the work less of a commodity product and
more of the fringe lifestyle. It's a scenic route that often fosters the most
memorable art. I'm not certain if any of the artist in Misssisssippi:May will
become art stars in Portland (or anywhere else for that matter) but the show
demonstrates that Portland supports and is still looking for something new and
undiscovered, despite it's lack of institutional support for these artists.
In that vacuum the created their own temporary institution and we should keep
an eye on this crew.
It would be nice to see something really ambitious and well done... and personally
Ive pretty much done my
last mondo
sized non-institutional warehouse show (some of the artists are now in MoMA
and The Met's collections). Which is to say, it is up to a new generation now.
Today is the last day of this show with a
silent auction and party running till 11:00 PM