It has been a while since PORT's done a round the web.
Both
The New
Yorker and
NYT's
have covered the Jeff Wall show.
The Portland Tribune reported last week on
a
smaller supplementary I-5 replacement bridge. I dislike this idea intensely
as a cost saving measure. Ive heard figures like, "20% of US trade passes
over the I-5 bridge each year," so skimping doesnt make any sense. Look, for such a project the fed's should
be on board, especially since with light rail it would have such an effect
on interstate traffic/commerce. Underbuilding is flat out stupid. I live on
N. Interstate and I see the traffic snarls daily and it hasn't even gotten as bad
as it will get. It's also the most major public works project to hit the Northwest
in decades. Time for a design competition; Foster, Calatrava, UN Studios etc.
Oh yes and DK's
dream
has come true, some drama at the museum... it's
only
some though. Frankly, it's not a contemporary art curatorial position so
I'm less interested (the O is a generalist publication it's their job to care
about such things). Yes, other attempts to make a big deal of a 1 million dollar
shortfall in a 40 million dollar building project have proved less than exciting
stories (or have a sense of scale). It's more interesting when curators leave
for other reasons (Like Robert Storr leaving MoMA) but in my mind I only care
if a curator puts on good shows or if programming at the museum is about to
be seriously effected. (disclosure Im co-vp of the Contemporary Art Council
and also I personally like Bill Mercer, Brian Ferriso and Bruce Guenther, some things are
probably just professional matters) My sources tell me that Mercer raised his
voice to a docent after he was put on notice, if so that's fine... museum workers
and volunteers don't need to be yelled at (seem's simple to me, and why not
have the chief curator handle the issue?) The real grist here is that up until
recently the museum did not have a proper HR department and with Ferriso on
board I would expect a different work culture to be in effect (as it seems to be). If only the O would pay such dilligent attention to the content of art vs the drama and money.
Last, but certainly not least
Edward
Winkleman has a nice post on having an over educated eye... i.e. that knowledge
of art complicates its understanding. Yes, sure...but why not? If work can shine
under such intellectual burdens it makes a case for its worth. I also like to
come at work as if Im newborn (to paraphrase Paul Klee) too. Fact is looking at
art in an ahistorical way can be just as complicating.
Thanks for signing in,
. Now you can comment. (sign
out)
(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by
the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear
on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)